The World is Watching –
And it is Not Applauding
I’d like to thank you for reading this week’s piece. And I want to send a special
thank you to everyone who has taken the time to send me cards and letters.
I greatly appreciate your words of encouragement and especially appreciate
those of you who have contributed to my efforts to keep this campaign going.
I have started a Go Fund Me site and I encourage you to visit to learn more.
https://gofund.me/79eb26b20
Brent Lambi is a graduate of the University of
Northern Iowa and the Creighton University School of Law.
PAID FOR BY BRENT LAMBI | PO BOX 241028 OMAHA, NE 68124
When the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics opened on February 6 at the sto-
ried San Siro Stadium, the ceremony was meant to celebrate Italian culture, harmony,
and the unifying spirit of sport. Instead, the Games have become a stage for some-
thing far more unsettling: a global indictment of the United States under the Trump
administration. Hundreds of student protesters filled Milan’s Piazza Leonardo da
Vinci before the opening ceremony even began, demanding that U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement agents leave Italian soil. Banners read “ICE should be in
my drinks, not my city.” When Vice President JD Vance appeared on the stadium’s
big screen, the crowd booed. By Saturday, thousands marched through the streets.
Police deployed water cannons and tear gas after a breakaway group threw firecrack-
ers and flares near the Olympic Village. At least seven people were detained. This
came on the heels of violent clashes in Turin the prior weekend, where more than
100 police officers were injured. One protester, an American student from Minnesota
studying abroad, told Reuters: “I thought that this was a good opportunity to show
that the rest of the world is not OK with what’s happening in Minnesota.” Even U.S.
Olympic athletes broke ranks. Freestyle skier Chris Lillis told a press conference he
was “heartbroken about what’s happening in the United States” and said the country
needs to “focus on respecting everybody’s rights.”
Not Just Milan: A World in Revolt
The Milan protests are not an isolated eruption. They are the latest chapter in a
cascade of international outrage that has been building for months, spanning multiple
continents and touching issues from immigration enforcement to territorial aggression
to the dismantling of democratic norms. In Copenhagen, thousands marched in the
“Hands off Greenland” rallies — the largest protests in Greenland’s history — after
President Trump threatened military force to annex the self-governing Danish ter-
ritory. Protesters chanted “Greenland is not for sale” and “Kalaallit Nunaat.” Red
“Make America Go Away” hats, a pointed inversion of Trump’s MAGA branding,
became a viral symbol of defiance across Scandinavia. Danish military veterans who
served alongside American troops staged a silent march to the U.S. Embassy, saying
they felt “let down and ridiculed” by the Trump administration. In London, 2,000
people protested outside Downing Street against the U.S. intervention in Venezuela.
During Trump’s 2025 state visit, thousands more filled the streets with signs reading
“Go away, Trump,” while activist groups projected images of Trump and Jeffrey Ep-
stein onto Windsor Castle. In Paris, the American flag was burned in the streets. In
Berlin, protesters gathered outside Tesla showrooms. Across Europe, “Hands Off!”
rallies drew hundreds of thousands to more than 1,300 events in cities including Lon-
don, Paris, Frankfurt, and Lisbon. A February 2026 YouGov poll confirmed what
the streets were already saying: unfavorable opinions of the United States have surged
across Western Europe.
The 1936 Comparison — Inverted
Some have drawn comparisons between Milan 2026 and the 1936 Berlin Olympics.
The comparison is instructive, but perhaps not in the way first intended. In 1936, the
world largely acquiesced. Nations attended, competed, and held their tongues while
the host regime consolidated power and persecution. The global community’s silence
at those Games became a historical stain — a cautionary tale about the cost of look-
ing away. Milan 2026 is, in many ways, the mirror image. The world is not silent.
It is shouting. The protests are coming not from fringe radicals but from students,
families with children, labor unions, healthcare workers, military veterans, Olympic
athletes, and even Europe’s own far-right politicians. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia
Meloni — no liberal — called Trump’s Greenland statements “unacceptable,” adding
that “friendship requires respect.” Nigel Farage called Trump’s Greenland threats a
“very hostile act” against Europe. When your ideological allies are recoiling, the prob-
lem is not with the world’s perception. The problem is with what they are perceiving.
Minneapolis to Milan: A Through Line
At home, the pattern is no less stark. The killing of Renée Good by an ICE agent
on January 7 ignited protests that have not subsided. In Minneapolis, 50,000 marched
in a general strike. Hundreds of businesses closed. Over 100 clergy members were
arrested at Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport. The Minnesota Governor
mobilized the National Guard. Portland, Chicago, and cities across all 50 states saw
demonstrations numbering in the hundreds of thousands. The administration’s re-
sponse has been to double down. ICE agents were dispatched to the Milan Olympics
— ostensibly for security — turning an international sporting event into a symbol of the
very enforcement policies the world is protesting. The result was predictable: Italian
students, European veterans, and American Olympians themselves used the global
platform to register their dissent.
Denial Is Not a Strategy
There is a pattern in the psychology of institutions under stress: when criticism
mounts from all directions — from allies and adversaries, from citizens and athletes,
from Copenhagen and Minneapolis alike — the temptation is to dismiss it all as bias,
misunderstanding, or coordinated opposition. But when Danish veterans who bled
alongside American soldiers in Afghanistan say they feel “ridiculed,” when even Gi-
orgia Meloni says “enough,” when your own Olympic athletes say they are “heartbro-
ken” — that is not bias. That is a mirror. The question for Americans is not whether
the world is wrong. The question is whether America is paying attention. A sign at the
Copenhagen protests, held by a Danish man named Peder Dam, featured Darth Vad-
er and Luke Skywalker from Star Wars. It read: “Americans: I know there is good in
you. Come back to sanity.” That is not the language of an enemy. That is the language
of a friend in grief.

This is the starting point for a deeper podcast...

The Action of Distraction
from the Epstein Issue
Welcome to the New American Order, where the Oval Office has
traded the Constitution for a ledger of favors, and the Department of
Justice has been rebranded as a boutique legal-shredding service
for the “Family.” To understand the current administration, one must
stop viewing it as a government and start viewing it as a Global Pro-
tection Racket.
The strategy is simple, effective, and deeply cynical: Use the Pardon
Power to build a loyal army of “Made Men,” stoke global chaos to
keep the public in a state of perpetual panic, and—under the cover of
that smoke—incinerate the files that link the President’s circle to the
ghost of Jeffrey Epstein.
I. The Pardon as “Signing Bonus”
The recent spree of clemency isn’t about “mercy”; it’s about Adminis-
trative Omertà. By pardoning January 6th rioters, the administration
isn’t just “healing the nation”—it is hiring a street-level enforcement
wing. By forgiving the debts of massive tax cheaters and drug king-
pins, it is ensuring that the “Family” treasury remains full.
When you pardon the guy who laundered the money and the guy
who broke the windows, you aren’t correcting a miscarriage of jus-
tice—you’re paying the legal fees for your own defense team.
II. The Epstein “Smoke Screen”
Why is the world currently in a state of manufactured collapse? Why
are we threatening nuclear trade wars one day and “intervening” in
foreign capitals the next? Because Chaos is a Shield. As the House
Oversight Committee begins to cross-reference the “missing” files
from the December 2025 Epstein document dump, the administra-
tion has conveniently pivoted to “World War III” rhetoric. It is a classic
mob tactic: Set a fire on the docks so the police don’t notice you’re
moving the contraband out the back of the warehouse.
The Executive “Get Out of Jail Free” Ledger
This chart illustrates the intersection of criminal clemency and the
systematic erasure of the Epstein “Client List.”
The Scathing Verdict: A Government
of the Few, By the Few
The world isn’t falling apart by accident; it’s being dismantled by
design. By liquidating over $1.3 billion in court-ordered restitution,
this administration has effectively robbed crime victims twice:
once by the original perpetrator, and again by the President who
deleted the debt.
The “chaos” we see on the news is merely the theatrical pyrotech-
nics intended to distract us from the fact that the Epstein Client List
is currently being fed through a high-speed industrial shredder at
the Department of Justice. We aren’t watching a presidency; we’re
watching a crime scene cleanup conducted on a global stage.
Category of “Loyalist” The Favor Granted The Cost to the Public The Epstein Connection / Cover
The Rioter (J6) Blanket Pardon $2.6M in unpaid damages;
shattered rule of law.
Distraction: Media focuses on “The
Return of the Patriots” instead of the
“Flight Logs.”
The Tax Cheat Debt Erased $34M+ lost to the Crime
Victims Fund (VOCA).
Loyalty: Ensuring high-net-worth
donors stay silent about 90s-era
social circles.
The Drug Kingpin Clemency $184M in liquidated fines
(Ulbricht/Silk Road).
Precedent: Normalizing the pardon
of “unconventional” multi-million
dollar crimes.
The Epstein Associate “The Redaction” Truth. 550+ pages of the 2025
release are blacked out.
The “Shredder Shield”: Protecting
“uncharged third parties” who
happen to be Cabinet members.
President Pardon Philosophy Financial Victims Handling of “The List
Trump (2025-26) Transactional: Loyalty
for Liberty.
$1.3B in restitution wiped out. Tactical: Redacting “File 468”
and deleting logs.
Joe Biden Procedural: Low-level
drug focus.
Minimal impact on victims. Signed the Transparency Act (which
Trump is now subverting).
Obama / Bush Institutional: DOJ-led
review.
Minimal/Standard collections. Maintained traditional DOJ firewalls.
Bill Clinton Controversial: Late-
term favors (Marc Rich).
High-profile but isolated. Names frequently appeared in
“unprotected” files

EDITORIAL:
The Great Narco-Hypocrisy
For years, the American public has been fed a steady diet of fire-and-brim-
stone rhetoric regarding the “War on Drugs.” We have been told that drug
dealers are “social predators” and “merchants of death” who deserve the ulti-
mate penalty. Yet, in a display of breathtaking hypocrisy that defies both logic
and law, this administration has turned the presidential pardon power into a
get-out-of-jail-free card for the very kingpins it claims to loathe.
The Hall of Fame for Kingpins
The administration is not using clemency to fix a broken system; it is using it to
reward the architects of the narco-state. While the President calls for the death
penalty for dealers on the campaign trail, his actions tell a different story:
• Juan Orlando Hernández (2025 Pardon): The former President of
Honduras, convicted of conspiring to import 400 tons of cocaine into
the U.S., was granted a full pardon in December 2025.1 Prosecutors
proved he used the Honduran military to protect drug shipments, yet
he was released just as his political allies sought his return.
• Ross Ulbricht (2025 Pardon): The founder of Silk Road, who facil-
itated over $200 million in illegal drug sales — linked to multiple
overdose deaths — was pardoned for his life sentence.2
• Larry Hoover (2025 Commutation): The founder of the Gangster Dis-
ciples, whose organization was responsible for an estimated $100
million in annual drug sales and countless murders, had his federal
life sentence commuted.3
The Blood of the “Suspected”:
Execution Without Evidence
While the elite and well-connected walk free, the “alleged” are met with fire.
Since September 2025, the administration has authorized Operation Southern
Spear, a campaign of lethal military strikes in the Caribbean and Pacific that
has killed at least 115 people on vessels merely suspected of drug smuggling.4
• Violation of Due Process: These are extrajudicial executions. Inter-
national law (UN Charter Article 2) and domestic law require due
process. Instead of interdicting vessels and making arrests, the mili-
tary has been ordered to “blow them up.”5
• Zero Proof: The administration has labeled these victims “narco-ter-
rorists,” yet has failed to produce a single shred of evidence — no
cargo manifests, no recovered narcotics — to justify the killings.6 To
the families of the dead, these aren’t “combatants”; they are missing
fishermen and migrants executed by a drone without a day in court.
Oil, Not Opioids: The Truth
Behind the Venezuela Invasion
The crowning irony is the recent military operation in Venezuela. Under the
guise of a “war on narco-terrorism,” the administration has captured President
Nicolás Maduro and declared its intention to “run the country.”7 However, the
President’s own words have betrayed the true motive.
By openly stating that the U.S. will tap Venezuela’s 300 billion barrels of oil
reserves — the largest in the world — to “self-finance” the mission, the ad-
ministration has admitted this is not about drugs. It is a resource grab cloaked
in the rhetoric of law enforcement. If the goal were truly to stop drug kingpins,
the President wouldn’t be pardoning them in the Oval Office while bombing
Caracas to “get our oil back.”
Selective Mercy:
A Historical Comparison
While every president uses clemency, this administration’s focus on major traf-
fickers is a radical departure.8 Past presidents focused on “Fair Sentencing” for
low-level offenders; this President focuses on the elite.9
The Cost of Contradiction
The message is devastating: If you are a high-ranking “narco-dictator” with
political value or a celebrity backer, the President will open the cell door. If you
are a “suspected” deckhand or a citizen of an oil-rich nation, the President will
authorize your death.
This is not “Law and Order.” It is a lawless exercise of ego that treats the feder-
al justice system as a personal toy and the military as a corporate raiding party.
The “War on Drugs” is no longer a policy; it is a cynical, bloody hoax.
Brent Lambi Author of the above, Graduate University of Northern Iowa B.A. in
Accounting Class of 1982, Graduate Creighton University School of Law Class of 1985.
PAID FOR BY BRENT LAMBI
PO BOX 241028 • OMAHA, NE 68124
Barack Obama
Joe Biden
Donald Trump
0
0
100+
Low-level, non-violent
crack cocaine offenders.
Blanket pardons for simple
marijuana possession.
Major Kingpins, political
allies, and high-level traffickers.
MAJOR DRUG KINGPINS/
PRESIDENT TRAFFICKERS PARDONED PRIMARY FOCUS OF CLEMENCY
[1] DOJ press release, 2024 — “Former Honduran President Juan
Orlando Hernández Sentenced to 45 Years in Prison for Drug
Trafficking Conspiracy.” Reuters, December 2025 — “Former
Honduran President Released From U.S. Prison After Presidential
Pardon.”
[2] United States v. Ulbricht, 31 F. Supp. 3d 540 (S.D.N.Y.). Federal
Bureau of Investigation & DOJ trial summaries (2015). Associated
Press / Reuters, January 2025 — “Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht
Granted Full Presidential Pardon.”
[3] ABC News Chicago / Associated Press, May 2025 — “President
Commutes Federal Sentence of Gang Leader Larry Hoover.” Illi-
nois Department of Corrections records.
[4] Operation Southern Spear — Maritime Lethal Strikes, U.S. De-
partment of Defense briefings (2025). Reuters Investigations,
Fall 2025 — “U.S. Expands Lethal Maritime Strikes on Suspected
Drug Smuggling Vessels.” Congressional Research Service (CRS)
— U.S. Counter-Narcotics Military Operations: Legal Authorities
and Limits.
[5] Due Process and International Law Constraints — United Nations
Charter, Article 2(4)., International Covenant on Civil and Politi-
cal Rights (ICCPR), Articles 2, 6, and 14., U.S. Constitution, Fifth
Amendment.
[6] Evidentiary Transparency Concerns — Reuters & AP reporting on
post-strike disclosures (2025)., Human Rights Watch — “Extraju-
dicial Killings and Counter-Narcotics Operations.”
[7] Venezuela Operation & Nicolás Maduro — United States v. Mad-
uro et al., S.D.N.Y. indictments. Reuters, January 2026 — “U.S.
Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Surprise Oper-
ation.” Congressional Research Service — Venezuela: U.S. Policy,
Sanctions, and Use of Force.
[8] Presidential Clemency Powers (Historical Context) — U.S. Con-
stitution, Article II, Section 2. Office of the Pardon Attorney —
historical clemency statistics. Congressional Record debates on
executive clemency.
[9] Clemency Focus by Administration (Comparative Analysis) —
Obama White House Clemency Initiative reports (2014–2016).
Biden White House announcements on marijuana possession
pardons (2022–2024). Congressional Record and press reporting
on Trump clemency actions (2017–2025).
SOURCES: Sources reflect publicly available court records, government documents, and reporting from major
U.S. and international news organizations. Some matters remain subject to legal challenge or evolving disclosure.
IS THE PROPOSED INVASION OF GREENLAND PART OF
THE WAR ON DRUGS? WILL THE UNITED STATES START
KILLING GREENLAND BOATERS NEXT? GREENLAND
IS “A WELL KNOWN NARCO-STATE “??? DOES
GREENLAND USE SEALS AS DRUG MULES?

New Year’s Editorial:
The Happiest Nations Aren’t Drunk on Credit
As the calendar flips and Americans raise a glass to “new beginnings,” a sobering truth sits ignored at the end of the bar: the happiest nations
on Earth did not get there by maxing out their credit cards, refinancing their homes like ATM machines, or gambling their futures on speculative
bubbles dressed up as innovation. They got there through discipline — personal and governmental — through restraint, and through a collective
understanding that prosperity without stability is an illusion.
The Top 5 Happiest Nations
and Why They’re Not Miserable About Money
Year after year, global happiness and life-satisfaction rankings tell the same story. The most content populations tend to live in countries that
practice boring, unglamorous, fiscally responsible habits:
Finland – High trust in institutions, low corruption, strong social safety nets, and modest consumer debt.
Denmark – Balanced budgets, high wages, low inequality, and citizens who don’t confuse happiness with consumption.
Iceland – Hard lessons learned after financial collapse, followed by reform — not denial.
Sweden – Long-term investment in people, not short-term political sugar highs.
Norway – The gold standard of fiscal adulthood.
These countries enjoy high consumer confidence not because credit is cheap, but because life is predictable, institutions are trusted, and the
future does not feel like a financial ambush waiting to happen.
Norway vs. America: A Tale of Two Futures
Norway sits atop a sovereign wealth fund worth well over a trillion dollars, built from oil revenues explicitly saved for future generations.
It is a nation that asked a radical question: What if we didn’t spend everything today and leave our children the bill?
America asked the opposite.
The United States, blessed with unmatched resources, innovation, and talent, has instead chosen permanent deficit spending, serial debt
ceiling theater, and a political culture addicted to postponing pain. Record government debt is no longer treated as an emergency — it’s treated
as background noise.
America’s Credit Addiction
The American household balance sheet tells a tragic, circular story:
• Refinance the home because interest rates are low
• Use home equity for vacations, cars, or lifestyle upgrades
• Pay off maxed-out credit cards
• Credit limits increase
• Spend again
• Repeat
This is not wealth creation. This is financial musical chairs — and when the music stops, someone is left standing with
negative equity and no seat.
Consumer confidence in America is fragile because it is artificial. It is built on teaser rates, minimum payments, and the
comforting lie that tomorrow will always bail out today’s excess.
Crypto: The Slot Machine With a White Paper
And then there is cryptocurrency — sold as rebellion, freedom, and the future, but often behaving like a casino floor with
better branding. Prices rise not on cash flow, productivity, or long-term utility, but on momentum and belief. Just like
musical chairs, it works beautifully — until it doesn’t.
Speculation is not a retirement plan. Volatility is not innovation. And hope is not a balance sheet.
Why Happier Nations Sleep Better
The happiest countries are not obsessed with:
• Constantly rising home prices
• Ever-lower interest rates
• Endless consumption as a substitute for meaning
They live in smaller homes, carry less personal debt, accept higher taxes in exchange for stability, and understand that
security is the foundation of happiness — not leverage.
A New Year’s Warning
America does not lack money. It lacks discipline.
• A nation addicted to easy credit eventually faces a brutal hangover: rising rates, falling asset prices, shrinking options,
and shattered confidence. History is clear on this point. Empires do not collapse from a lack of wealth — they collapse
from pretending debts don’t matter.
• As the New Year begins, the happiest nations quietly keep their books balanced and their futures funded. America,
meanwhile, keeps ordering another round — convinced the bill will never arrive.
• It always does.
Norway plans for grandchildren.
America refinances for spring br

Christmas, Christ, and the Failure of “Big People”
Every Christmas, the powerful wrap themselves in
the language of faith while governing in ways that
mock it.
Nativity scenes are displayed. Carols echo through
marble halls. Bibles are lifted for cameras. Yet across
the world—and within our own borders—millions of
God’s children go without healthcare, food, or shelter,
while a privileged few are rewarded with private
airplanes, gold toilets, multiple mansions, and
fortunes too large to count.
This is not Christianity. It is spectacle.
Jesus Christ was not born among the rich or the
comfortable.
“She gave birth to her firstborn son… and
placed him in a manger, because there was
no room for them in the inn.”
— Luke 2:7
A small manger, yet big ethical ramifications that
still judge the powerful today.
God Has No “Garbage People”
In too many capitals—Washington included—
people are ranked as worthy or unworthy. The poor
are dismissed. The sick are blamed. Refugees are
dehumanized. Entire populations are treated as
expendable.
But Scripture is unequivocal:
“So God created mankind in His own
image.”
— Genesis 1:27
There are no “garbage people” in God’s eyes. No
disposable lives. No surplus humanity.
Jesus Himself erased every hierarchy of human value:
“Whatever you did for one of the least of
these brothers and sisters of mine, you
did for me.”
— Matthew 25:40
When the poor are denied food, when the sick die
without care, when families sleep without shelter,
Christ is the one being rejected.
A World of Excess Beside a World of Suffering
While some nations lack basic healthcare, while
children starve and elders die untreated, others
accumulate obscene luxuries—private jets, gold-plated
bathrooms, third and fourth homes—wealth locked
away by the few while the many suffer.
Scripture does not bless this imbalance. It condemns
it.
“Woe to you who add house to house
and join field to field until no space is left.”
— Isaiah 5:8
And again:
“You have hoarded wealth in the last
days…The wages you failed to pay the
workers cry out against you.”
— James 5:3–4
This is not success. It is moral failure.
Power Without Mercy Is Not Christian
Jesus never praised wealth without compassion or
power without restraint.
“Blessed are the merciful, for they will be
shown mercy.”
— Matthew 5:7
Leadership in Christ’s name demands humility, not
domination.
“The rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them…
Not so with you.”
— Matthew 20:25–26
Any system that rewards excess while tolerating
misery stands in direct opposition to the Gospel.
Faith Is Not a Photo Op
Perhaps nothing better symbolizes the spiritual
collapse of modern leadership than the use of the
Bible as a political prop—held aloft for attention
while its teachings are ignored.
“These people honor me with their lips, but
their hearts are far from me.”
— Matthew 15:8
Jesus reserved His harshest words for religious
hypocrites who used faith to elevate themselves:
“Woe to you… you clean the outside of the
cup, but inside they are full of greed and
self-indulgence.”
— Matthew 23:25
Christianity is not branding. It is not a costume. It is
not a shield for greed.
God’s Love Has No Borders
At Christmas we remember that the Holy Family
themselves were poor, displaced, and later refugees
fleeing violence.
“I was a stranger and you invited me in.”
— Matthew 25:35
God’s love does not stop at borders, bank accounts,
or nationalities. Any theology that does is not
Christian—it is power dressed in religious language.
The Manger Still Judges the Throne
Mary understood this truth before any king did:
“He has brought down rulers from their
thrones but has lifted up the humble.”
— Luke 1:52
The manger still asks the questions leaders refuse to
answer:
• Why do some die without medicine while
others hoard excess?
• Why is shelter treated as a privilege instead
of a human need?
• Why is Scripture quoted while Christ’s
teachings are ignored?
This Christmas, Choose Christ—Not Performance
If leaders truly wish to honor Christmas, they must
stop posing with Bibles and start living by them.
“What does the Lord require of you? To act
justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly
with your God.”
— Micah 6:8
Until then, the manger stands as a silent indictment.
Because a child born among the poor still judges the
powerful.
And He always will.
Merry Christmas!
Brent Lambi
Graduate of University of Northern Iowa
Class of 1982, Graduate of Creighton School
of Law Class of 1985
PAID ADVERTISEMENT
PAID FOR BY BRENT LAMBI PO BOX 241028 OMAHA, NE 68124
The above material is the original work and intellectual property
of Brent Lambi and/or his assigns or licensees. Except where
otherwise noted, reproduction, republication, distribution, or use of
this material in whole or in part is prohibited without prior written
permission. The above Christmas message is freely available for
reprinting without attribution or credit to the author. Select previous
works may be available for purchase. Sponsorships and public
speaking engagements may also be arranged. For additional
information, please contact Brent Lambi directly

Donald Trump’s War on Drugs
Two Faces of a Failed Policy
Brent Lambi – Concerned Citizen
For years, Donald Trump thundered about a
tough war on drugs – even suggesting extreme
penalties for dealers and praising foreign leaders
who executed alleged traffickers without trial. Yet
the clemency record from his time in the White
House tells a very different story: one in which
convicted drug traffickers and kingpins have
been granted pardons or had their sentences
commuted after being properly adjudicated in
court. The result is a striking contradiction at the
heart of American criminal-justice policy.
How Many Drug Pardons and
Commutations?
According to analysis of recent clemency data
and reporting:
• Trump has pardoned or granted clemency to
at least 10 individuals convicted of serious drug-
related federal crimes in his second term alone.
The Washington Post
• During his first term, he also pardoned or
commuted the sentences of at least 13 other
convicted drug traffickers. Portside
• Combined, that suggests at least 23 documented
federal drug traffickers whose convictions
were undone or softened—not including other
clemencies for peripheral or non-drug crimes.
Portside
These are individuals who were convicted in courts
of law and serving long federal sentences for drug
distribution, conspiracy, or trafficking—and then
were later granted clemency by presidential fiat.
Notable Examples
• Juan Orlando Hernández
Former president of Honduras, convicted in U.S.
federal court for organizing drug trafficking that
moved roughly 400 tons of cocaine into the
United States. He was sentenced to 45 years in
prison then pardoned and released by Trump in
December 2025. Politico
• Ross Ulbricht
Founder of the Silk Road dark-web marketplace,
convicted of operating an online platform that
facilitated millions of dollars in illegal drug sales,
and serving life plus 40 years. Trump issued a full
pardon in January 2025. VPM
• Larry Hoover
Co-founder of the Chicago Gangster Disciples,
convicted of running a vast drug organization
and sentenced to multiple life terms. Trump
commuted his federal sentence in 2025, even as
a state murder conviction still stands. Justice.gov
• Garnett Gilbert Smith
Convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine
and serving a 25-year sentence, later granted
clemency. Wikipedia
• Anabel Valenzuela
Convicted of conspiracy to distribute significant
quantities of methamphetamine (50g+ with
forfeiture and laundering charges); sentence
commuted. Wikipedia
• And others:
Other individuals convicted of major drug
trafficking conspiracies ranging from meth
distribution to cocaine conspiracies were also
granted clemency by Trump during both terms,
especially around the final days of his first
presidency. Portside
The Hypocrisy Is Hard to Ignore
We are asked to take seriously the alleged war on
drugs—to fund military strikes, to justify harsher
border policies, and to applaud extreme rhetoric
about punishment even before guilt is proven in
courts. Yet in reality, the executive lunges toward
leniency for precisely those who were proven
guilty in courts of law.
The clemency power is constitutional. But when
wielded selectively—pardoning well-connected
traffickers and politically useful figures—it sends
a chilling message about fairness, equal justice,
and the rule of law. Critics note that some pardons
appear tied to political support, influence, or
lobbying rather than to any coherent view of
justice. The Washington Post.
The Real Costs
This double standard has real consequences.
While traffickers walk free or see decades-
long sentences erased, everyday communities
continue to suffer from addiction, violence, and
the unrelenting flow of fentanyl and other hard
drugs. Trump’s rhetoric often focused on killing
drug dealers abroad, even when due process was
absent or questionable. But his pardon list shines
a spotlight on a clemency policy that softens
punishment for those who already lost their day
in court.
Such inconsistent governance undermines trust
in both law enforcement and the justice system
and weakens our ability to seriously confront the
public-health and criminal-justice crisis that drugs
have created in the U.S. and beyond.
Conclusion
President Trump’s record on drugs is not simply
contradictory – it illustrates a profound problem:
weaponized justice that punishes some harshly
and forgives others without explained criteria. In
a just society, due process means something for
everyone – not just those with political clout.
The war on drugs isn’t about justice anymore—
it’s about politics. And that’s the real failure we
should be talking about.
PAID ADVERTISEMENT
SOURCES
Washington Post – Reporting on Trump’s second-term pardons and commutations for individuals convicted of serious federal drug offenses.
Portside – Documentation of clemencies granted during Trump’s first term, including drug-trafficking convictions undone or reduced.
Portside + additional clemency listings – Combined reporting establishing at least 23 federal drug-trafficking convictions affected by Trump clemency actions.
Politico – Coverage of the conviction, sentencing, and December 2025 presidential pardon of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández (400-ton cocaine
trafficking conspiracy).
VPM (Virginia Public Media) – Reporting on Trump’s January 2025 full pardon of Ross Ulbricht, founder of Silk Road, convicted of facilitating large-scale online drug
trafficking.
Justice.gov – U.S. Department of Justice records regarding the federal conviction and later commutation of Gangster Disciples co-founder Larry Hoover.
Wikipedia (source summaries) – Entries documenting the convictions and clemencies of Garnett Gilbert Smith and Anabel Valenzuela (federal cocaine and
methamphetamine trafficking cases).
Portside (additional examples) – Reporting on additional high-level narcotics and conspiracy convictions receiving clemency during both Trump presidencies.
The above material is the exclusive work product and intellectual property of Brent Lambi and/or his assigns and/or licensees. Any republication, reproduction, distribution,
or use—whether in whole or in part—is strictly prohibited without express written permission. Select former works are available for purchase. Sponsorship and public
speaking engagements may also be arranged. Please contact Brent Lambi directly for further information.

Donald Trump’s proclaimed “War
on Drugs” did not just fail — it in-
verted the basic logic of justice.
Consider Juan Orlando Hernán-
dez, former president of Honduras.
In 2024, a federal jury convicted
him of conspiring to import cocaine
into the United States after years of
investigation and testimony. Yet in-
stead of being treated as a caution-
ary tale, he has been portrayed by
some in Trump’s orbit as deserving
sympathy or reconsideration — a
striking contrast to how far less pow-
erful suspects are treated.
At the same time, investigative
journalists and human-rights or-
ganizations have raised questions
about certain U.S.-linked interdic-
tion operations abroad and at sea.
These reports do not prove unlaw-
ful conduct, but they describe inci-
dents where suspects died during
missions that produced no arrests,
trials, or publicly released evidence.
If even partly accurate, they suggest
the line between enforcement and
extrajudicial force has blurred.
The Constitution guarantees due
process and fair trial rights for all,
and it gives Congress — not the
president — authority to declare
war. International treaties ratified by
the United States further prohibit
the killing of individuals who are not
active combatants or who have not
been afforded judicial protections.
Yet while enforcement at the bot-
tom can be harsh and opaque, the
response at the top looks very dif-
ferent. Ross Ulbricht, convicted af-
ter a full trial and sentenced to life,
received a presidential pardon. His
guilt was established, but his sen-
tence was erased through executive
clemency.
A pattern emerges: unproven sus-
pects may face lethal force, accord-
ing to credible reporting, while prov-
en offenders may receive mercy.
Constitutional limits appear flexible
depending on political usefulness.
That is not equal justice. It is a hi-
erarchy shaped by influence.
When clemency repeatedly bene-
fits the well-connected, it raises a le-
gitimate public question: Is this truly
a war on drugs, or a system that pro-
tects the powerful while punishing
the powerless?
History will not remember this ap-
proach as strength. It will remember
it as a betrayal of the principle of
equal justice under law.

America has been told to “trust
the process” far too many times,
and too often that process leads to
sealed records, missing documents,
and silence from those in power.
With Congress passing the Epstein
Files Transparency Act, the question
now is simple: Will the public finally
see the truth — or another managed
illusion of it?
The law requires the Department
of Justice to release all unclassified
records related to Jeffrey Epstein’s
investigation and prosecution, in-
cluding materials involving associ-
ates, flight logs, internal DOJ com-
munications, and documentation of
his detention and death. It also re-
quires the documents to be posted
within 30 days in searchable, down-
loadable form.
Crucially, the DOJ cannot with-
hold information merely because it
might embarrass or politically dam-
age public officials.
Certain redactions are permit-
ted — such as victim identities,
child-sexual-abuse materials, and
content that could compromise
active investigations. But the law
provides no forensic audit ensuring
the records haven’t been altered or
erased before publication.
This moment is not about parti-
sanship. It is about whether a justice
system that failed victims for de-
cades can now be trusted to reveal
the full truth. America does not need
another promise of transparency. It
needs proof.
Justice Turned
Upside Down
The Hypocrisy of
Trump’s “War on Drugs”
America Doesn’t
Need Promises
It Needs the Truth
About the Epstein Files
SOURCES
DOJ & SDNY trial records: U.S. v. Juan Orlando Hernández (2024); Reuters & AP reporting
on prosecutors’ evidence. DOJ OIG (2017), ProPublica & Human Rights Watch investigations
on U.S.-linked interdiction practices. U.S. Constitution (Amend. V & VI; Art. I §8); Geneva
Conventions, ICCPR & U.N. Use-of-Force Principles. DOJ: Ross Ulbricht Sentencing (2015)
& White House Clemency List (2021). AP, NYT, Brookings & Harvard Law Review analyses of
Trump-era clemency patterns.
SOURCES
Epstein Files Transparency Act of 2024, Congressional text and summary, U.S. Congress.
(Requirements for release of “all unclassified records,” inclusion of materials involving
associates, flight logs, internal DOJ communications, detention documentation.)
Ibid. (Mandate that records be released within 30 days in searchable and downloadable
format.)
Ibid. (Prohibition on withholding or redacting records solely due to embarrassment,
reputational harm, or political damage.)
Ibid. (Allowed redactions: victim PII, child-sexual-abuse materials, items affecting active

HE SEDITION ACT: DEAD SINCE 1801, YET RESURRECTED AS A THREAT
The Sedition Act of 1798 expired in 1801 and has NEVER been ruled on by the Supreme Court. Why?
Because even in the early republic, leaders knew it wouldn’t survive constitutional scrutiny. Modern
First Amendment doctrine makes it unmistakably clear: resurrecting the Sedition Act or even invoking
its spirit against political opponents, comedians, journalists, or members of Congress is completely
baseless, profoundly unconstitutional, and fundamentally incompatible with American democracy.
A government official swearing to uphold the Constitution twice yet threatening critics with a law
that no longer exists and was widely condemned even in its own time, is not merely reckless, it is a
betrayal of the oath of office. Using expired and discredited sedition rhetoric to attack opponents is
an attempt to chill speech through fear, not law.
THE DANGER OF FALSE SEDITION ACCUSATIONS
Threatening people for warning the military about ILLEGAL orders is one of the most disturbing trends
of all. These warnings don’t encourage defiance—they uphold the law. Members of the military are
REQUIRED to disobey illegal orders. Reminding them of this is not sedition. It is civic responsibility.
To suggest that such speech is criminal is to turn the Constitution upside down.
A FREE PRESS THREATENED BY INTIMIDATION
The intimidation of Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, newspapers, and television networks, often
through veiled threats of politically motivated mergers or regulatory retaliation represents a direct
attack on the First Amendment’s guarantee of a free press.
The message is unmistakable: “Speak out, and you may be punished.”
This is the exact abuse the First Amendment was written to prevent.
A CLIMATE OF FEAR FOR ORDINARY CITIZENS
When citizens feel that questioning government actions might put a ‘target on their back,’ the problem
is not the citizens — it is the culture of intimidation coming from those who view dissent as a threat
rather than a constitutional right.
I write this editorial with the full understanding that people raising valid legal or constitutional concerns
may fear retaliation. That fear is itself proof of how urgently this conversation is needed.
PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS
Document everything. Share concerns with trusted people. If you ever feel threatened, contact
appropriate authorities and civil rights organizations. Your right to speak freely is protected by law, no
matter who attempts to intimidate or silence you.
Democracy requires citizens who refuse to bow to fear. And the First Amendment is not just a right.
It is the cornerstone of the American promise.
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN WASHINGTON AND URGE
THEM TO SUPPORT OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

When we debate “illegal immigration” today, we often forget the deepest
irony in our own history: the first undocumented immigrants on this
continent were the European settlers. They arrived without permission
from the Native American nations who had lived here for thousands of
years. They were met with generosity and were allowed to stay.
That kindness was not repaid. From Sand Creek to Wounded Knee, Native
peoples endured deception, broken treaties, disease, removal, and violence.
Even alcohol was weaponized to exploit and destabilize entire communities.
These people were not “obstacles” to progress — they were human beings
whose homelands were taken and whose cultures were nearly destroyed.
As modern immigrants are condemned simply for seeking safety and
opportunity, it is worth remembering who the true newcomers once were,
and whose land made our nation possible.
This Thanksgiving, we should reflect on that
history with humility and with gratitude.
We are all fortunate to be here in the United States of America, a country built
from many peoples and enriched by each new generation. As we gather with
family and friends, may we choose generosity over fear, compassion over
exclusion, and remember that sharing our nation’s wealth and opportunities
with those who seek a better life is not a burden — it is a blessing.
Happy Thanksgiving
Brent Lambi

Before 1892, the United States had no federal immigration system. Millions poured into this
country with no visas, no green cards, and no background checks — only hope, courage, and
the promise of freedom. By today’s standards, every immigrant who arrived before Ellis Island
opened would be called “undocumented”. Yet those very people built the railroads, plowed
the plains, raised the factories, and gave birth to the American middle class.
If we applied today’s deportation policies to the 19th century, most Americans alive now would
never have been born. Our cities, universities, and industries — the backbone of the modern
United States — were shaped by immigrants who entered without paperwork. America’s
greatness is rooted not in walls or quotas, but in open doors and opportunity.
The Constitutional Crisis Today
Today, we face a moral and legal paradox. The Constitution grants Congress — not the
President — the authority to make immigration law and gives the Judicial Branch the power
to interpret and review its application. Yet, the Executive Branch has often acted unilaterally
— ordering mass arrests and deportations, separating families, and ignoring court rulings that
affirm basic due-process rights.
Such actions violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantee equal protection
and due process to “all persons” — not just citizens. The Supreme Court has consistently
recognized that anyone on U.S. soil, regardless of status, is entitled to constitutional protection.
When the Executive Branch detains or deports people without proper judicial oversight, it
undermines the separation of powers that defines our Republic.
A Nation Defined by Inclusion, Not Exclusion
The truth is simple: if the United States had expelled its “undocumented” immigrants of the
1800s, America as we know it would not exist. The idea that today’s immigrants are somehow
less deserving of humanity or constitutional protection contradicts both our history and our
founding principles.
The real crisis is not at the border — it is in Washington, where the Executive Branch disregards
the limits of its own power, bypassing courts and constitutional obligations in the name
of political expediency. To honor our past and preserve our future, we must remember
that every generation of Americans once included someone who arrived without papers, but
with a dream.
— Brent Lambi
Creighton University School of Law Class of 1985
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN WASHINGTON AND URGE
THEM TO SUPPORT FAIR AND HUMANE IMMIGRATION POLICIES
Sunday, November 23, 2025
Brent Lambi, Independent
America’s
Undocumented Founders:
A Constitutional Reckoning on Immigration
SENATOR DEB FISCHER
448 Russell Senate
Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-6551
fischer.senate.gov
SENATOR PETE RICKETTS
139 Russell Senate
Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-4224
ricketts.senate.gov
CONGRESSMAN
DON BACON
2104 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 225-4155
bacon.house.gov
CONGRESSMAN
MIKE FLOOD
343 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 225-4806
flood.house.gov
CONGRESSMAN
ADRIAN SMITH
502 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 225-6435
adriansmith.house.gov
SENATOR CHUCK GRASSLEY
135 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-3744
grassley.senate.gov
SENATOR JONI ERNST
730 Hart Senate
Office Building
Washington, Dc 20510
202-224-3254
ernst.senate.gov
CONGRESSMAN
ZACH NUNN
1232 Longworth House
Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-1503
202-225-5476
nunn.house.gov
CONGRESSMAN
RANDY FEENSTRA
1440 Longworth House
Office Building
Washington, DcC 20515-1504
202-225-4426
feenstra.house.gov