The Biggest Lie I Have Ever Witnessed / The Right Move for the Wrong Reason / If J. Edgar Hoover Became President / A Pause and an Apology

HONEST POLITICS
Brent Lambi
When I filed this case, I expected a
straightforward process involving discovery
and documents. If the record supported
it, I also expected the true wrongdoer to
be named as a third party defendant.
That is not what has happened. It is my
opinion that discovery in this matter is being
shaped by people whose names do not
appear in the case caption. I cannot prove
that today, and I will not tell readers otherwise.
I can only tell you what I believe and
why I am acting on it.
I am therefore pausing my lawsuit.
I want to be plain about Berkshire Hathaway.
My view is that the company and
its agents may themselves have been used
by someone else who gave them a version
of events and left them to act on it.
A Pause and an Apology
An update on the Berkshire Hathaway defamation matter
and why I am putting my own case on hold for now.
THE LONGEST CON
In 1974, Republicans of substance walked into the Oval Office and said STOP.
Today, saying stop is what gets you destroyed.
SEVEN COUNTS AGAINST THE ENABLING PARTY
ON AUGUST 7, 1974, three Republicans walked into the Oval Office and told a Republican
president he did not have the votes and was not going to get them. Barry Goldwater.
Hugh Scott. John Rhodes. Two weeks earlier, six Republicans on the House Judiciary
Committee had crossed the aisle to vote articles of impeachment. Elliot Richardson
and William Ruckelshaus had resigned rather than fire a prosecutor. Howard Baker
had asked the question that ended a presidency.
Nobody called them traitors. They were called Republicans.
They did not act alone. Katharine Graham kept the Washington Post printing while
that same White House went after the broadcast licenses of her television stations. The
New York Times printed the Pentagon Papers and won 6 to 3 at the Supreme Court. A
free press did its job. A party with a spine did its job. The Republic survived the collision.
Fifty-two years later, that party is gone. What replaced it is, in this writer’s opinion,
the longest running confidence game ever worked on the American public.
THE ENABLER’S DICTIONARY
Every con needs confederates. Ours hold committee gavels, and they have built
themselves a vocabulary. “I’d rather work within the party. I did what I
thought was best under the circumstances. I don’t comment on social
media posts. I’d have to see the whole quote.”
Translated back into English: I saw it. I know exactly what it was. And I
want the endorsement more than I want the oath. That is not prudence.
That is a lookout at the door while the safe is emptied.
AND WHEN THEY REFUSE
Ask Mike Pence, whose reward for following the Constitution on one Wednesday in
January was a mob chanting for his hanging while a President suggested the mob had
a point.
Ask Marjorie Taylor Greene, the most devoted MAGA voice in the House until she
demanded the Epstein files be opened. She was rebranded “Marjorie Traitor Greene,”
promised a primary challenge, and resigned her seat on January 5. Ask Thomas Massie,
Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace, who signed that same petition.
Ask John McCain, told he was no war hero and insulted after his death. Ask Liz
Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Mitt Romney, Jeff Flake, Bob Corker, Justin Amash. Ask
Chris Krebs, fired for saying the election was secure. Ask Brad Raffensperger and Rusty
Bowers, who simply counted. Of the ten House Republicans who voted to impeach,
eight were gone within two years.
Every one a Republican. Not one accused of stealing a dollar. They were destroyed
for candor, and the survivors watched, learned, and shut up.
That silence is the party’s only real platform. Here is what it buys.
ONE: THE FILES THEY WILL NOT OPEN
Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act;
the President signed it. It forbids withholding any record
for embarrassment, reputational harm or political sensitivity.
Justice blew the deadline, dumped three million
pages a month late, and still sits on millions more. In
June a federal judge found the administration had likely
violated the Act. Not one Republican leader will say the
word all.
TWO: THE PARDON FOR THE
NARCO-PRESIDENT
Juan Orlando Hernández, president of Honduras,
convicted in a New York courtroom of conspiring to push
cocaine into this country, which prosecutors counted
in the hundreds of tons, and sentenced to 45 years. He
served about eighteen months. Pardoned December 1,
2025; out the same day. This administration blows up
boats in the name of the drug war and freed the biggest
trafficker it ever convicted.
THREE: THE AFFORDABILITY
THAT WENT SOMEWHERE ELSE
Through June, consumer prices were up 3.5% on the
year, gasoline up 26.7%, electricity up 4.0%, against wage
growth of 3.2%. The one ledger that soared belongs to
the family in the White House: a 927-page disclosure
reporting nearly $1.2 billion in crypto income for 2025,
with roughly $1.55 billion pulled out of World Liberty
Financial while outside token holders lost an estimated
$674 million.
FOUR: THE HEALTH CARE THEY LET EXPIRE
Congress let the enhanced premium tax credits lapse
on December 31, 2025. Marketplace premiums rose
roughly 26% for 2026, and KFF estimates the amount
subsidized enrollees pay themselves more than doubled,
from about $888 a year to $1,904. Analysts put the
added uninsured in the millions. There was no replacement
plan. There has never been a replacement plan.
FIVE: THE FARM ECONOMY THEY CALL A WIN
USDA forecasts 2026 net farm income at $153.4 billion,
a fourth straight year of pressure, while farm sector
debt hits a record $624.7 billion and interest expense a
record $33 billion, about $90 million a day. Chapter 12
farm bankruptcies rose 46% in 2025. Against a 25 million
tonne soybean pledge, Chinese buyers had booked
roughly 200,000 tonnes. Our farmers are being paid in
bridge payments instead of markets.
SIX: THE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS
He promised to end the war in Ukraine in twenty-four
hours. Nineteen months into this term, the truces last thirty-
two hours at a time and men are still dying in the mud.
SEVEN: THE BILL YOUR CHILDREN INHERIT
$39.8 trillion in federal debt, about $286,000 per
household. Interest on that debt now costs more than
the entire defense budget. The party of fiscal responsibility
ran it up, then named a ballroom after itself.
Image created with AI.
IF YOU WANT YOUR FAMILY SAFE FROM DRUGS………………………………….DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
IF YOU WANT THE FILES OPENED AND THE PREDATORS NAMED………DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
IF YOU WANT REAL SOLUTIONS IN HEALTH CARE……………………………….DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
IF YOU WANT HIGHER FARM INCOME…………………………………………………..DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
IF YOU WANT MONEY LEFT OVER FOR A HOME OF YOUR OWN…………..DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
IF YOU WANT AN END TO FOREIGN WARS…………………………………………….DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
IF YOU WANT THE DEBT BROUGHT DOWN…………………………………………..DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
State house. County board. School board. Congress. There is no local exception to a national loyalty oath.
AND BEFORE YOU DECIDE IT DOESN’T MATTER, ASK YOURSELF ONE MORE QUESTION:
CAN YOU STILL AFFORD THE GAS TO DRIVE TO THE POLLS?
IF YOU REALLY WANT TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
THEN DON’T VOTE REPUBLICAN.
“Berkshire is not the author of this
defamation but a vehicle for it.”
If I am right, Berkshire is not the author
of this defamation but a vehicle for it. To
the extent that my filings suggested otherwise,
my apology is sincere.
My hope is that Berkshire Hathaway or
its agents will come forward or tell others
what I suspect they may already know: the
origin of this matter is federal.
I remain of the view that my dispute
with the federal government is ongoing
and that the government’s objective is to
silence and discredit me.
Free speech has cost me a great deal. In
this political climate, it is plainly not free.
Brent Lambi
The opinions expressed above
are solely those of the author.

HONEST POLITICS
Brent Lambi
The Strait is Not The Border
Forty thousand people looked at the world as it is and
decided to swim. The rest of us should ask what they were
swimming away from and who built it.
Last week, tens of thousands of young Moroccans walked into the sea. French reporting
put the figure near 40,000; Ceuta’s own leader estimated 60,000, with Madrid counting roughly
8,000 children among them. They swam around a breakwater toward a beach in Africa that
happens to belong to Spain. Dozens drowned doing it.
Ask why, honestly. The answer is not recklessness. It is arithmetic. From Fnideq, a young
man can see, five kilometers across open water, a life he cannot reach in forty years of labor
on his own side. He priced the swim against the wait and took the swim. Meanwhile, Ukrainians
die defending a border, Gazans die trapped inside one, and half the world lives beyond
the reach of a physician.
He priced the swim against the wait and took the swim.
We are told some nations simply do things right. Norway educates its children, insures its
sick, and pensions its elderly. But Norway also sits atop North Sea oil and had the rare discipline
to bank the proceeds for the unborn instead of spending them on itself. Afghanistan
has been an empire’s chessboard for a century and a half, with British, Soviet, and American
powers each arriving with a theory and departing with a body count. Institutions matter
enormously. So does whether the world ever permitted you to build any.
That distinction should trouble us, because it decides who gets to be born lucky.
So here are the questions we should ask aloud and answer on the record:
If prosperity is largely an accident of geology, geography, and who invaded whom, on what
moral ground do we call it earned?
Is a border a legitimate line of governance, or a fence around a lifeboat?
We spent $113 billion on 145 days of war in Iran. What would that sum have purchased in
clinics, wells, and classrooms, and which purchase would have produced fewer swimmers?
If a stranger’s child drowns within sight of your shore, does distance excuse you, or only
comfort you?
And the hardest one: do we hold these gifts in trust, or in fee simple?
A man born on the lucky side of the water will tell you
it was his swimming that got him there.
The Compliment You Didn’t Ask For
On being diagnosed by people who have never opened a chart
Congratulations. You have been diagnosed.
Not by a physician, not after an examination, and not on the basis of anything you actually
said. You were diagnosed the instant you produced a fact your opponent could not answer.
The condition is called Trump Derangement Syndrome, and the only known symptom is
winning.
Consider how the diagnosis is made. You cite a dollar figure. You cite a court ruling. You
ask a question with a documentary answer. Your opponent, finding no fact of his own, reaches
past the argument and reaches for you. He does not say the number is wrong. He says you
are unwell.
In debate, this maneuver has a name older than the republic. It is the ad hominem, and it
is not a rebuttal but a surrender delivered in the tone of an insult. A man with better evidence
produces the evidence. A man without it produces a label. When the label arrives, the scoring
is over; only the volume is still in dispute.
A man with better evidence produces the evidence.
A man without it produces a label.
Notice what the phrase concedes. To call criticism deranged is to admit that criticism exists
in quantity and that ordinary people, given the record, keep arriving at the same unflattering
conclusion. That is not a syndrome. That is a consensus.
Honesty requires a word for the other side. Some criticism is unhinged. There are people
who read a grocery receipt as a coup and who would be no better company under any other
president. Say so when you see it. But the cure for a bad argument is a better one, not a nickname,
and the man who cannot tell the difference has told you which he lacks.
So accept the honor. When someone informs you that you are deranged, he has told you
three things: he heard you, he could not answer you, and he would rather discuss your mind
than his candidate’s record.
Take the trophy. It was awarded under protest, which is the only kind worth having.
The Sickness No Medical
School Can Cure
A billion dollars to build healers, while others use
their offices to tear them down
CHANGE MY MIND
In February 2024, a woman in her nineties stood before a room of medical students in the
Bronx and told them their tuition was gone. Ruth Gottesman had taught at Albert Einstein
College of Medicine since 1968, specializing in learning disabilities, and chaired its board of
trustees. The billion dollars came from her late husband, David, an early investor in Berkshire
Hathaway, who left it to her to spend as she saw fit. She saw fit to make Einstein tuition
free in perpetuity, the largest gift ever made to an American medical school.
Understand what she actually bought. Tuition ran nearly $59,000 a year, and roughly half
of Einstein’s graduates left owing more than $200,000. Debt of that size does not merely burden
a young doctor; it selects her specialty for her. It steers her away from pediatrics, from
primary care, from the clinic in the neighborhood that needs her most and pays her least.
Gottesman did not make doctors rich. She made doctors possible and freed them to study,
to research, and to serve.
“She did not make doctors rich. She made doctors possible.”
Set that beside the spectacle we now call oversight. Anthony Fauci spent five decades on
HIV, Ebola, and COVID and helped build a program credited with saving millions of lives
abroad. His reward in 2026 was a subpoena and a hearing room designed to produce a referral
rather than an answer.
One American spent a fortune expanding the nation’s capacity to heal. Others use their
offices, their subpoena power, and our money to attack the people who already did.
That is the contrast worth amplifying. A gift like Gottesman’s is not charity; it is infrastructure.
It will outlive every politician currently auditioning outrage for a fundraising list.
Medical school can teach anatomy. It cannot teach gratitude. It can teach pharmacology,
but there is no course in humility, and no prescription for a public official who mistakes
destruction for duty. That sickness is moral, not clinical, and the only known treatment is
administered at the ballot box.
“It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no
distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”
MARK TWAIN, Following the Equator (1897),
Pudd’nhead Wilson’s New Calendar
What the Pool Reflects
Sixteen million dollars, a friend with a contract awarded without
bidding, and a mirror the President refuses to look into.
“Nothing so needs reforming as other people’s habits.”
Mark Twain, Pudd’nhead Wilson’s Calendar (1894)
A reflecting pool has exactly one job. It shows you what is standing in front of it.
For roughly $16 million of the public’s money, the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool
has performed that job with a fidelity no one in this administration intended. It reflected a
rushed vanity project. It reflected a contract handed to a friend. It reflected a government
that, confronted with its own failure, went looking for a citizen to punish.
THE MONEY
A $14.7 million contract awarded without competitive bidding went to Atlantic Industrial
Coatings of Virginia to spread blue waterproofing across the pool’s concrete floor, justified
by urgent need. The Park Service bypassed competitive bidding by invoking an urgency exemption
tied to the nation’s 250th anniversary. A second contract, worth $1.7 million, went
to Green Water Solutions, an Ohio firm whose owner keeps a home in Palm Beach less than a
mile from the President’s Palm Beach residence. Its controlling figure, John J. Cafaro, has two
felony convictions: a 2001 guilty plea for conspiring to bribe a congressman and a 2010 plea
for a campaign finance violation. A deadline became a license. The license became a favor.
The work failed within days. The coating peeled. The water turned green. And the President
of the United States went on social media to announce, without evidence, that saboteurs had
cut a gash measuring 250 feet into the facade and poured corrosive chemicals into the water.
THE BLAME
Then came the arrests. A person who was 17 years old was cited over a piece of paint. And
David “Davey” Hearn, who competed in the Olympics three times, was indicted on a felony
charge carrying a sentence of up to ten years, accused of pulling up roughly two square feet
of liner. The U.S. Attorney announced “tremendous evidence.”
On July 31, that case collapsed. Prosecutors told the court the damage resulted from
flawed installation by the contractor, not vandalism. More damningly, they said that if the
Interior Department had been forthcoming with information already in its possession, no
indictment would ever have been sought.
A man who cannot look at a mirror without
demanding it show him someone else.
Credit where it is owed: Jeanine Pirro corrected the record against her own interest. Days
earlier, the Interior secretary had told the country the contractor did a fantastic job and would
be rehired for the repairs. And the President? On Saturday he answered the confession of his
own Justice Department by insisting the major damage was still the work of vandals.
WHAT HISTORY RECORDS
Here is the part worth remembering. History reflects well on the public servant who owns
a mistake. It always has. Voters forgive error; they do not forgive the official who insists the
mirror is lying. Pirro will be remembered for the harder filing, not the easier one. An honest
correction is not weakness; it is the whole reason an office is worth holding.
An Olympian’s name was put on a federal felony indictment to cover a contractor’s failure.
That is not a paint problem. That is the machinery of federal prosecution turned into a
drop cloth.
THE RIPPLE
“We are discreet sheep; we wait to see how the drove is going,
and then go with the drove.” Twain wrote that of the American
habit of borrowing an opinion rather than forming one.
But a reflecting pool does more than mirror. It ripples. Whatever is thrown into it travels
outward to the edges, which is to say, to us. A political party is an implied association. When
a voter stands inside a party line and says nothing about a contract awarded without bidding
and steered to a neighbor, or an innocent citizen charged to protect an official story, that
silence becomes part of the reflection. It is not only the President in that water. It is everyone
standing behind him who declined to speak.
Congress has the bidding under review. Voters hold something stronger: a ballot and the
standing to demand honesty before they spend it. Demand it out loud and demand it of your
own side first. History reflects favorably on those who did and keeps a clear record of those
who did not.