The Weight of War: Honoring the Fallen — and Asking Who Among Us Has Truly Earned the Right to Send the Next Generation Into Battle

Your Ballot Is Not Local
A ballot cast at the county line is spent in Washington and in every capital watching how we answer.
There is no longer any such thing as a purely local vote.
A county commissioner, legislator, or school board member running on the MAGA line is not an isolated figure. That candidate is a precinct in a national machine. The candidate’s margin is reported as a mandate. Party leadership reads the win as permission. What the candidate ratifies at home is executed in Washington and exported to the rest of the world.
To shrug at either is to choose the predator over the prey.
So put two questions to that candidate and write down the answers.
Will you demand the complete, unredacted release of the Epstein files? Congress already answered: the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed overwhelmingly and set a December 19 deadline. Seven months later, a federal judge was still ordering the Department to unredact records or explain itself. Among those records was a draft indictment with the names of potential accomplices blacked out. Redaction shields victims. Nothing in that statute authorized the Department to shield names.
Will you condemn the pardon of Juan Orlando Hernández? A federal jury convicted him; a judge sentenced him to 45 years for a scheme that moved more than 400 tons of cocaine into this country, the equivalent of some 4.5 billion doses, while he boasted he would stuff the drugs up the gringos’ noses. The President erased the punishment in a social media post. This month he returned home to cheers in Tegucigalpa.
I state this as my opinion, and I mean it plainly. A candidate who will not answer those two questions stands on the same moral ground as someone who knows what was done to a child and keeps it secret. The files are records of children sold to powerful men. The pardon freed a trafficker who poisoned somebody’s sons and daughters by the ton. To shrug at either is to choose the predator over the prey. I would not leave a child in such a person’s care. I do not intend to leave a county, a state, or a country there either.
Your ballot does not stop at the county line. Cast locally, it is spent nationally and globally: in a Justice Department that treats a deadline as a suggestion, in a pardon power operated as a favor bank for the convicted and connected, and in every capital now reading American law as negotiable.
Ask them at the forum. Ask them on the doorstep. Then vote as though the answer will be enforced in your name, because it will be.
Name Calling Is Not a Denial
The President answers questions about Epstein with a label.
A label is not an answer.
Ask the President why the Epstein files remain sealed and redacted, and you will not get an answer. You will get a diagnosis.
In Michigan on July 27, a man in the crowd accused him of protecting pedophiles. Mr. Trump did not rebut the charge. He waited for security, pointed into the audience, and pronounced the man a communist. He then pivoted to a riff about seized houses and tax rates of 80 percent. The accusation went unanswered. The crowd got a villain instead.
This is the whole method. Demand transparency from the left and you are a communist. Demand it from the right, as Marjorie Taylor Greene did, and you are branded a traitor. Demand it in print and the entire matter becomes a hoax perpetrated by Democrats. The label performs the work the evidence cannot.
“The faithful execution of the laws is not a left-wing hobby.”
Consider what is being called communism here: the belief that the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a law the President himself signed, ought to be obeyed. That is not Marx. That is Article II. The faithful execution of the laws is not reserved for the political left, and insisting upon it is not a symptom requiring treatment.
Note, too, who gets pathologized. Not the trafficker. Not the men in the flight logs. The citizen asking the question.
A man with nothing to hide answers questions. A man with something to hide changes the subject and then insults whoever noticed. We have now watched both.
Release the files. Unredacted. Then call us whatever you like.
A SATIRE ON THE STEWARDSHIP OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
The Crazed Librarian
A public collection is a trust, not a private shelf, and the clerk at the desk is not the author.
Imagine a librarian who wakes one morning having forgotten that he does not own the library.
The books were bought with the public’s money. The building was raised by the public’s hand. His only job is to keep the doors open, the shelves stocked, and the card catalog honest, so that every citizen who walks in may find what is there and judge it for himself. Instead, our librarian arrives with a red pen, a stepladder, and a nameplate.
First, the pen. The Smithsonian, that great national reading room, has been directed to hand over its wall placards, its exhibition catalogs, its internal guidelines, and its plans through 2029, so that “divisive” language may be replaced with something more “unifying,” as though the American past were a customer complaint to be managed. At the Kennedy Center, the board was cleared and restocked with loyalists. Programming vanished. Artists walked. This is not curation. This is a librarian rewriting the endings he dislikes and shelving the rest in the basement.
“One tradition endows. The other edits.”
Second, the ladder. Andrew Carnegie funded some 2,500 libraries, put his name on the masonry, and then handed the collections to the towns that used them. Set that beside the Moscow model of librarianship, where the catalog is revised to match the man behind the desk and yesterday’s authors are quietly erased. One tradition endows. The other edits.
Third, the nameplate. Dulles. Penn Station, its name reportedly dangled in exchange for sixteen billion dollars in frozen tunnel money. The Institute of Peace, rebranded. The Kennedy Center itself was renamed in December, but a federal judge barred the change in May, and workmen scraped off the letters in June. A national park pass bearing the President’s face beside Washington’s. A House committee voting 33 to 25 to name the Opera House for the First Lady. Somewhere, a bill waits to make an international airport a monogram.
Fourth, the tote bag. A rule so obvious that it was never written down: what the library buys or produces while the librarian is employed does not follow him home when he retires. It is not his to box up and shelve beside a bathtub for late reading. The collection stays. The clerk leaves.
A librarian who stamps his name across every spine has confused stewardship with ownership. The remedy is old and unglamorous: he is not the author, not the publisher, not the owner. He is the temporary clerk on duty.
The books belong to us. Every one of them. Including the ones he would rather we did not read.
A PERSONAL NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR
THEY HAVEN’T THROWN ME FROM A WINDOW – BUT THEY ARE TRYING
In Putin’s Russia, dissidents have a way of falling from hospital windows. Businessmen who speak inconvenient truths meet inconvenient ends on staircases and balconies across Moscow.
I am writing this from Omaha, Nebraska. I have not been thrown from a window.
THE IRS AS A WEAPON OF SILENCE
But I am being thrown out of something just as vital: my life savings. What I am experiencing is what I believe to be a targeted, methodical IRS assault. Not random, not routine, not coincidental. It follows my speaking out. It follows my refusal to be silenced. In Russia, they silence critics with gravity. In America, I think they are learning to do it with audits, paperwork, and financial ruin. Stripping away everything a person has built until the cost of their voice becomes too steep to bear.
See Lambi v. United States of America, et al Case # 8:2026cv00101U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
SLANDER THROUGH TRUSTED INSTITUTIONS: THE BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY CAMPAIGN
And the IRS is not the only instrument being wielded against me. I believe I have also been the victim of deliberate, government-sourced slander and lies spread to professional contacts who had no reason to doubt what they were told. I believe that honest, hardworking realtors employed by Berkshire Hathaway, one of the most respected real estate companies in America built on a foundation of integrity, were fed false information about me by government actors. These were decent professionals simply doing their jobs, used as unwitting vectors of what I think is a smear campaign designed to isolate me professionally, damage my reputation, and ensure that doors would close before I could even knock on them. This is not the free market. This is not the rule of law. This is the deliberate destruction of a private citizen’s livelihood by government machinery set in motion to punish dissent. I believe that Berkshire Hathaway is as much of a victim in this as I am.
See Brent Lambi, Pro Se V. Berkshire Hathaway Home Services, et al Case
# DO1CI260001752Nebraska District Court, Douglas County
I AM STILL STANDING
This is the American version of defenestration. No broken glass. No headlines. Just a man with his savings under assault, his name poisoned in his own community meant to serve as a quiet warning to everyone watching. The message is clear: speak up, and we will take everything. Your money. Your reputation. Your future.
I am still watching. I am still writing. I am still standing. And I intend to be heard.
The opinions expressed above are solely those of the author.
Both Hands On The Scale
They came for the lawyers. Then they came for the newsroom that reported it.
Two things protect an ordinary person from a government determined to have its way: a lawyer willing to take an unpopular case and a reporter willing to publish an unwelcome fact. Both were squeezed quietly through paperwork.
Start with the lawyers. The White House signed orders against Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, and Susman Godfrey, stripping security clearances, canceling government contracts, and barring their attorneys from federal buildings. In plain terms, you cannot get in the door, and your clients are punished for hiring you. A judge found that the firms were chosen for the causes they champion and the clients they represent. Four federal judges ruled the orders unconstitutional; the government dropped its appeals. Nine other firms never fought. Instead, they pledged hundreds of millions in free legal work to avoid being named. Protection money.
The courts said no. So the pressure moved to the institution that still tells the public what happened.
60 Minutes reported that campaign against the law firms. Scott Pelley won a Cronkite Award for that very coverage. Meanwhile, the President was suing CBS for $20 billion over an interview edit, while CBS’s parent needed federal approval for an $8 billion merger. Picture the person suing you while also holding the permit you need to stay open. Paramount paid $16 million. The merger cleared.
Now follow the chain. The new owner installed Bari Weiss atop CBS News. Weiss fired the show’s executive producer, three senior producers, and correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega, and then installed Nick Bilton, a technology journalist with no traditional broadcast news experience. On June 2, Pelley was fired too, a day after reportedly telling staff that Weiss was “murdering the show.” A finished segment on an El Salvador prison had already been pulled. Three correspondents remain.
No law was passed. No vote was taken. Clearances, contracts, a merger review, and a personnel file did the work.
Silence the lawyer and the case is never filed. Buy the network and the silencing is never reported.
That is not a policy dispute. That is the removal of both witnesses.
So put these questions to every Republican or MAGA candidate on your ballot, on the record:
ONE. Four federal judges ruled these orders against law firms unconstitutional. Do you agree with those rulings: yes or no?
TWO. Should a federal license, contract, or merger approval ever depend on how a network covers the President: yes or no?
And if a candidate will not answer either question, ask plainly: why are you against the rule of law and the First Amendment?
Silence is an answer. In my opinion, it is the wrong one, and it belongs on the ballot beside the candidate’s name.

ON THE POLITICS OF POSTHUMOUS HONOR
We the People, Not We
the Vindictive
The nation’s highest civic tributes have become
spoils of a partisan war that ought to end at the grave.
It is time to bind them in statute.
When Lindsey Graham lies in state beneath the Capitol dome on July 28, the Rotunda
will do what it too often does. It will confer the republic’s highest civic honor
by the oldest and least honorable of standards: who had the votes.
There is no statute that governs this. None. Lying in state requires only a concurrent
resolution of Congress, and the criteria are whatever the majority happens to
feel that week. That is precisely why the Rev. Jesse Jackson, a man who marched
from Selma, ran twice for president, and carried the moral weight of a movement,
was denied the Capitol Rotunda his supporters requested and sent home to a state
capitol instead.
Honor flows to friends․ Insult flows to rivals․
The dead deserve better than a scorecard․
It is why John McCain, a genuine war hero, was saluted with the flag grudgingly
lowered to half staff. A sitting president raised it and lowered it again only after veterans’
groups shamed him into decency.
The pattern is unmistakable. The dead are ranked not by service to the country
but by their standing with whoever holds the gavel and the flagpole. And so the
machinery of national mourning, including the Rotunda, the flag at half staff, and
commemorative coins and stamps, becomes one more prize in a feud that should
have no place beside a casket.
This is a disgrace, and it is fixable. Congress should establish clear, neutral criteria
in federal law for who receives these honors, considering the length and character
of national service and measuring it by law rather than by grudge. It should take
the decision out of the hands of small men who treat a funeral as a ballot.
The Rotunda belongs to the nation, not to a faction. The flag at half staff should
salute the citizen, not flatter the powerful. Let these honors be dispensed by We the
People, not We the Vindictive.

The Wanted Poster
and the Parade
Picture your own town. Then look at what we’ve become.
Picture the sheriff’s office in your own town. On the wall hangs a poster: WANTED.
The charge is stealing children by carrying them off from a neighboring county
in the middle of a fight. Everyone who walks in sees that face. Everyone knows what
he is accused of. Now picture the Fourth of July. The mayor doesn’t just let that man
into town. He gives him the lead float. He seats him up front where the children can
wave. He rides beside him down Main Street, smiling for the cameras, while the
band plays and the flags snap in the wind. Nobody mentions the poster. It is still on
the wall, three blocks away, gathering dust.
“The poster is still on the wall․ We just handed him the float․”
That parade was real. It happened on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. The
man on the float was Vladimir Putin, wanted by the International Criminal Court
since March 2023 for the unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children. The lead float
was a red carpet and a shared limousine. The mayor was the President of the United
States. And the poster, the warrant, is still on the wall, gathering dust.
There is a second float in this parade. Israel’s prime minister rides it while under
his own ICC warrant for the conduct of the war in Gaza. He is welcomed to the
reviewing stand more often than any other guest in town. When someone asks the
mayor why, the answer is always the same: these are good men to do business with.
As if a warrant were a credit rating. As if the poster on the wall were a suggestion.
And here is the part that should turn a decent stomach. There is one poster that
can never be printed in this town: the mayor’s own. We built the sheriff’s office so
that no outside court could ever hang our leaders on that wall. A rule that binds
only the strangers you dislike, and never the friends you profit from, is not the law.
It is a parade permit.
You can tell what a town honors by whom it puts on the lead float. Right now, we
are saving that seat for wanted men while asking the children to wave.

The Chickenhawk’s Ledger
They declare the wars. Someone else’s children pay for them.
They send the young to die, then call it honor.
Consider the arithmetic no one in power wants totaled. The average American
killed in Iraq and Afghanistan was about 26 years old. He earned a junior enlisted
wage, often $25,000 to $40,000 a year, and his net worth, after a truck payment and
some debt, hovered near zero. He left behind a spouse who will raise his children
on the memory of a folded flag.
Now consider those who signed his orders. The President draws $400,000 a year.
A member of Congress draws $174,000, and the median lawmaker is worth roughly
$1 million. In the House, the average member is worth some $8 million. They vote
for war from marble chambers, confident that their own sons will never have to
trade civilian life for a Humvee.
“The powerful discover their courage precisely when
the bleeding will be done by someone else․”
The pattern is bipartisan and shameless. Donald Trump, who as commander
in chief ordered strikes and deployments, sat out Vietnam through a string of deferments,
capped by a convenient diagnosis of heel spurs. Bill Clinton, who fired
cruise missiles from the Oval Office, maneuvered clear of that same war through
his own tangle of deferments. Two men, two parties, one privilege: the wars are
always for other people’s children.
This is the oldest swindle in the republic. The powerful discover their courage
precisely when the bleeding will be done by someone poorer, younger, and more
decent than themselves. The soldier believes he is defending a democracy. Too often
he is defending the fortunes and reputations of men who arranged, when it was
their turn, to be somewhere safe.
We are told to honor the fallen. Fine. But honor is cheap when it costs a wreath
and a speech. Real honor would mean this: no one who dodged a war should vote
to start one, and no lecture on sacrifice from a millionaire who never risked a dime
or a son.
The ultimate price is paid by the few: the young, the broke, and the loyal, all
on behalf of the many who profit and preen. Until that ledger is read aloud, the
speeches are only noise over fresh graves.

Selling Tickets to Insider Information
on a Platform Called “Truth Social”?
Consider the branding. A company named for truth, running a platform named
for truth, now proposes to sell truth itself by the millisecond to the highest bidder.
Beginning August 1, Trump Media & Technology Group’s “Truth API” will pipe the
president’s posts that move markets to banks and trading firms milliseconds before
the public sees them, for a reported monthly fee in the six figures. The name promises
information for the people; the product delivers it to the auction winner.
Recall Joseph Kennedy’s shoeshine boy, trading on the same tip as the tycoon.
At least he shared the tycoon’s information. Today, the White House teleprompter
operator reads the words that move markets before they are even spoken and is
better informed than Kennedy’s bootblack ever was, while the public learns them
last. Proximity to the podium is now an asset for rent.
One set of rules for you․ No rules for him․
Strip the euphemism and it is plain: tickets to insider information, sold at the
door. Speed, when the merchandise is government policy, is no convenience. It is
a head start on the Treasury, marketed by a company largely owned by the president’s
own trust. The SEC exists to forbid exactly this asymmetry. That presidents
were exempted from conflict of interest statutes decades ago does not bless the arrangement;
it exposes the loophole. Every prior occupant treated policy as public
property and released it to everyone at the same time. This one meters the tap and
pockets the meter.
Retire the pretense: “Truth Social” is a turnstile, and truth is the commodity behind
it, sold first to the few and delayed for the many. Veritas pro populo? Not at
these prices. “Markets already move on our posts,” the company boasts. Precisely.
That is the confession, not the defense.

The Wrong Kind of Strength
When the Pentagon starts measuring its people by their
hormones instead of their heads, the Republic should worry.
The Secretary of Defense has apparently concluded that the gravest threat to
American arms is not incompetence, not poor judgment, not the slow erosion of
merit, but low testosterone. Last week, Pete Hegseth ordered mandatory annual
hormone screening for every service member over thirty, wrapping the order in
swaggering rhetoric about high testosterone and a “Department of War.” Physicians
reacted with something close to disbelief; one kinesiologist dismissed the idea
of blanket screening of everyone over thirty as a ridiculous notion. They are right.
Consider what actually won the Second World War. It was not the biggest biceps
in the barracks. It was radar, the codebreakers, the Manhattan Project, penicillin,
and an industrial machine no adversary on earth could match. America triumphed
because it out-thought its enemies, not because it looked more menacing. The decisive
weapon was the disciplined human mind, marshaled by leaders who understood
that victory is counted in objectives achieved, not in blood spilled.
Our finest commanders earned their laurels the same way. Washington’s patient
retreats and Eisenhower’s meticulous planning avoided needless slaughter rather
than chasing it. Strategic restraint is not weakness. It is the highest form of strength,
and it requires a clear head, not a chemically inflated one.
That is precisely why this fixation alarms. We are telling the men and women
who guard the most fearsome arsenal ever assembled, an arsenal capable of ending
civilizations, that aggression is a virtue to be maximized. Roid rage and the nuclear
codes are not a pairing any sane republic should court.
And beneath the hormone charts lies the real rot: a merit system built on competence,
character, and candor is being quietly swapped for a loyalty system built on
flattery. Advancement now flows to those who echo the boss, not to those who tell
him hard truths. Ability is out; adoration is in.
Has all sanity left Washington? The nation’s defense demands both the best
minds we can find and the spine to promote them.
When the Bank Robber
Lectures You on Vault Security
A convicted felon’s crusade against “election fraud”
collapses the moment you read the record.
When Donald Trump warns America about “election fraud,” listen closely. It is
the bank robber lecturing the tellers on vault security. No public figure alive has a
thinner claim to the language of law and honesty, and the case against him is not
opinion or partisan spin. It consists of docket entries, signed memos, and pardon
paperwork. Together, they form a record any citizen can read.
Trump is a convicted felon, found guilty by a Manhattan jury in 2024 on thirty
four counts of falsifying business records. It was the first such verdict against a
former president in our history. Not an accusation. A verdict. He lectures us on
“rigged” systems from the far side of a conviction he could not talk his way out of.
Then recall 2020. He swore the election was stolen and marched into court
roughly sixty times to prove it, appearing before judges he appointed. Even his own
attorney general found no fraud that could have changed the result. He lost nearly
every case because he had no evidence. A man who cannot win a single fraud case
has no standing to cry fraud forever.
Consider whom he has freed. On his first day back in office, he pardoned or commuted
some 1,500 January 6 defendants, including Oath Keepers and Proud Boys
convicted of seditious conspiracy and rioters who beat the officers defending the
Capitol. The party of “back the blue” now cheers the very men who bloodied them.
Then, in December 2025, he pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former
Honduran president whom a U.S. jury convicted of moving over 400 tons of cocaine
toward American streets in one of the largest and most violent trafficking
conspiracies in the world. He bombs fishing boats in the name of a drug war while
unlocking a convicted kingpin’s cell.
One set of rules for you․ No rules for him․
Consider whom he shields. He signed a law to release the Epstein files, then let
his own Justice Department blow past the deadline and keep the record buried.
His deputy attorney general, his former personal lawyer, interviewed Ghislaine
Maxwell, a convicted trafficker of underage girls. She was quietly moved to a softer
prison. The victims wait. Maxwell gets comfort.
And consider whom he exempts. In 2026, a Justice Department memo declared
the IRS “forever barred” from auditing Trump, his family, his trusts, and his businesses.
A possible $100 million penalty simply evaporated. One set of rules for you.
No rules for him.
This is not conservatism. It is not law and order. It is a man rewriting history in
real time, betting you won’t check the record. In November, check it. And if you can
cheer every line above, you have earned the red face to match the red hat.
A Personal Note From the Author
They haven’t thrown me from a window but they are trying.
In Putin’s Russia, dissidents have a way of falling from hospital windows. Businessmen
who speak inconvenient truths meet inconvenient ends on staircases and
balconies across Moscow. I am writing this from Omaha, Nebraska. I have not been
thrown from a window.
The IRS as a weapon of silence.
But I am being thrown out of something just as vital: my life savings. What I am
experiencing is what I believe to be a targeted, methodical IRS assault. It is not random,
routine, or coincidental. It follows my speaking out. It follows my refusal to
be silenced. In Russia, they silence critics with gravity. In America, I think they are
learning to do it with audits, paperwork, and financial ruin, stripping away everything
a person has built until the cost of speaking becomes too steep to bear.
See Lambi v. United States of America, et al., Case No. 8:2026cv00101,
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Slander Through Trusted Institutions: The Berkshire Hathaway Campaign
And the IRS is not the only instrument being wielded against me. I believe I have
also been the victim of deliberate, government-sourced slander and lies spread to
professional contacts who had no reason to doubt what they were told. I believe
that honest, hardworking real estate agents employed by Berkshire Hathaway were
fed false information about me by government actors. Berkshire Hathaway is one
of the most respected real estate companies in America and was built on a foundation
of integrity. These were decent professionals simply doing their jobs, used
as unwitting vectors of what I think is a smear campaign designed to isolate me
professionally, damage my reputation, and ensure that doors would close before
I could even knock on them. This is not the free market. This is not the rule of law.
This is the deliberate destruction of a private citizen’s livelihood by government
machinery set in motion to punish dissent. I believe that Berkshire Hathaway is as
much a victim of this as I am.
See Brent Lambi, pro se v. Berkshire Hathaway Home Services, et al.,
Case No. D01CI260001752, Nebraska District Court, Douglas County.
I am still standing.
This is the American version of defenestration. No broken glass. No headlines.
Just a man with his savings under assault and his name poisoned in his own community,
all of it meant to serve as a quiet warning to everyone watching. The message
is clear: speak up, and we will take everything. Your money. Your reputation.
Your future.
I am still watching. I am still writing. I am still standing. And I intend to be heard.
The opinions expressed above are solely those of the author.Sell Alaska. Take the money. Run.
Two broke empires once sold us a continent.
It is time we returned the favor.
America has a long and honorable tradition of buying continents from broke
warmongers. It is time we returned the favor.
Consider the pattern. In 1803, Napoleon needed cash after bleeding out in Haiti
and preparing to bleed out across Europe. He sold us 828,000 square miles for
$15 million, roughly three cents an acre, because empires with expensive hobbies
eventually need a garage sale. In 1867, Tsar Alexander II, still nursing the hangover
of the Crimean War, sold us Alaska for $7.2 million. Two cents an acre. Seward’s
Folly, the papers sneered. The folly, of course, belonged to the man who had spent
his treasury on artillery instead of infrastructure. We are now that man.
“Every nation that ever sold a continent said the same
things right up until the invoices arrived.”
Our national debt has sailed past $37 trillion, propelled by a foreign policy that
treats the Pentagon budget like a bar tab we will settle in the next life. Venezuela.
Iraq, twice, in case the first one did not take. And now serious people in serious
rooms are discussing the acquisition of Greenland, apparently on the theory that
what this country really needs is more frozen real estate we cannot afford to heat.
So sell the frozen real estate we already have.
Alaska is, geographically speaking, Canadian. It sits atop British Columbia and
the Yukon like a hat. It is separated from the contiguous United States by an entire
foreign country, a fact we handle by pretending the map is not doing what the map
is obviously doing. Alaskans drive to the rest of America by driving through Canada.
Let us stop the charade.
The price? Alaska’s proven oil and gas reserves, mineral deposits, fisheries, timber,
and 365 million acres of land plausibly run into the low trillions. Call it $3 trillion,
at a friendly neighbor rate, with financing available. That is eight percent of the
debt erased in a single afternoon, plus we stop paying for statehood’s upkeep and
gain a permanent excuse to blame Ottawa for the price of salmon.
The objections write themselves. National security. Sovereignty. Sentiment.
Fine. But note that every nation that ever sold a continent said the same things,
right up until the invoices arrived.
History’s lesson is not that great powers fall. It is that they get billed. Russia and
France learned it. We are about to.
Two cents an acre bought it. Let us see what we can get.
This satire is offered in the spirit of Swift and in earnest about the arithmetic